Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Petr Andreev's avatar

Excited about Vitalik Buterin and etherium decentrilised computing, I had a great ethical experience with UETH during EDCON 2023. I found some quests there who helped me a lot in our try to trace stolen funds

Also I engaged in retrodrop and wallet mint activities. And they very disapoint me. The frontend of the exercise was problematic, with lags and unresponsive feedback sections. The university's lack of response mirrored typical crypto companies, neglecting response and consumer protection. Ethereum Foundation's trajectory seems to favor not just elitism, but also jeopardizing its role as a good alighment organization

While UETH may not be entirely bad, it falls short of being good. Consumer feedback about frontend and in smart-contract is ignored, and winning strategies favor in-house players, reminiscent of scam gambling platforms. It's not enough to find winning strategy because UETH could just not paid your winning. The promise to plant trees excitment but doesn't compensate for the dissatisfaction caused by ignored error reports and unpaid winnings and do not keeping their word. And most likely everything will only get worse with growing of UETH size. I met a lot of high IQ tech eth enthusiasts that much clever than me but High IQ is not enough to be good

A call for a more ethically model or effective information processing system resonates, aiming for safe and responsible crypto gambling for it's costumers. In the era of decentralized computing and potential dangers from GAI alighment and possible quantum hacking of weak Jsons, responsibility and rise of good ethic is paramount. Hope you will become good!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts